Solar Power vs. Fossil fuels vs. Nukes

Submitted by Factchecker on Fri, 2008/06/06 - 12:14pm.

Here's a good article that gives hope that large scale solar power is quickly taking root due to the high cost of fossil fuels and the rapidly decreasing costs of generating solar power. Excerpts:

It's pure economics, not a green dream anymore.
...
The industry likes to point out that between 1996 and 2005, U.S. utilities built 250 gigawatts of natural-gas-fired plants, now producing a quarter of the nation's total. There's now nothing standing in the way of building another 250 gigawatts of power using pollution-free solar thermal.

And we didn't have to wait for Cheney to leave office or a Congress with backbone to mandate anything. This is faster and cheaper than new fossil fuel or newkular plants.

Imagine how much wider the difference in costs will be by the time the older, dirtier technology plants would get on line, many years in the future.



Brian A.'s picture
Oil up $12/barrel in the

Oil up $12/barrel in the past two days.

Brian A.
I'd rather be cycling.

Wow, you should have heard

Wow, you should have heard this guy just interviewed on CNN. He was quite excited, all atwitter about the biggest single day increase in oil price as well as the Dow down 300. I hope he doesn't jump.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is used to make sure you are a human visitor and to prevent spam submissions.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.