There are currently 22 users and 240 guests online.
Solar Power vs. Fossil fuels vs. Nukes
Submitted by Factchecker on Fri, 2008/06/06 - 12:14pm.
Here's a good article that gives hope that large scale solar power is quickly taking root due to the high cost of fossil fuels and the rapidly decreasing costs of generating solar power. Excerpts:
It's pure economics, not a green dream anymore.
...
The industry likes to point out that between 1996 and 2005, U.S. utilities built 250 gigawatts of natural-gas-fired plants, now producing a quarter of the nation's total. There's now nothing standing in the way of building another 250 gigawatts of power using pollution-free solar thermal.
And we didn't have to wait for Cheney to leave office or a Congress with backbone to mandate anything. This is faster and cheaper than new fossil fuel or newkular plants.
Imagine how much wider the difference in costs will be by the time the older, dirtier technology plants would get on line, many years in the future.
Wow, you should have heard this guy just interviewed on CNN. He was quite excited, all atwitter about the biggest single day increase in oil price as well as the Dow down 300. I hope he doesn't jump.
Oil up $12/barrel in the past two days.
Brian A.
I'd rather be cycling.
Wow, you should have heard this guy just interviewed on CNN. He was quite excited, all atwitter about the biggest single day increase in oil price as well as the Dow down 300. I hope he doesn't jump.
Post new comment